The rule in plain words
Derogations for identified staff under Article 94(3)(b) of the CRD cannot be negative.
EBA checks it for 16 rows, from where the institution applies the derogation under 94 (1)(l) CRD, but with a lower threshold as implemented under national law, please indic (0030) to fixed remuneration (0210). That makes 16 checks. A failure names the one that failed.
How the Line4 Check report words itShowHide
The first of its checks, word for word as the report shows it when it fails. The others read the same, with their own column, row or sheet.
Derogations for identified staff under Art. 94(3)(b) CRD: Where the institution applies the above derogation, but with a lower threshold as implemented under national law, please indicate the thresh >= 0
What to do if your filing fails it
- 01Open the template below and find the cells the rule reads.
- 02Look for a value with the wrong sign in these cells, such as an amount entered as a negative number.
- 03EBA compares the values exactly here: there is no rounding tolerance.
- 04It runs only when your filing indicators mark R 05.00 as reported.
- 05This is a warning. It does not stop the filing on its own, but your authority may ask you to explain it.
The cells it reads
Rows
- 0030Where the institution applies the derogation under 94 (1)(l) CRD, but with a lower threshold as implemented under national law, please indic
- 0040Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation
- 0060Percentage of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation
- 0070Total remuneration of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation
- 0080Of which: variable remuneration
- 0090Of which: fixed remuneration
- 0110Where the institution applies the above derogation, but with a lower threshold as implemented under national law, please indicate the thresh
- 0120Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation
- 0130Percentage of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation
- 0140Total remuneration of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation
- 0150Of which: variable remuneration
- 0160Of which: fixed remuneration
- 0180Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation
- 0190Total remuneration of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation
- 0200Of which: variable remuneration
- 0210Of which: fixed remuneration
Column
- 0020Derogations for identified staff under Art. 94(3)(b) CRD
A worked example
The first of its checks, with simple numbers.
Where the institution applies the above derogation, but with a lower threshold as implemented under national law, please indicate the thresh, derogations for identified staff under Article 94(3)(b) of the CRD must then be at least 0.
A file that reports 0 passes. One that reports -100 fails, by 100.
The numbers are illustrative.
Show the rule as writtenShowHide
EBA's formula, as written out for the first of its checks. Cells are written as {template, row, column, sheet}.
{R_05.00,r0110,c0020,} >= 0The next five:
{R_05.00,r0210,c0020,} >= 0{R_05.00,r0060,c0020,} >= 0{R_05.00,r0130,c0020,} >= 0{R_05.00,r0180,c0020,} >= 0{R_05.00,r0200,c0020,} >= 0And 10 more, the same formula for the other cells it covers.
Other rules on R 05.00
- Derogations on a firm wide basis cannot be negative (v12147_s)Warning
- Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation, derogations on a firm wide basis cannot be more than total number of identified staff, total (row 0040, v12526_m)Warning
- Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation, derogations for identified staff cannot be more than total number of identified staff, total (row 0040, v12527_m)Warning
- Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation, derogations for identified staff cannot be more than total number of identified staff, total (row 0120, v12528_m)Warning
- Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation, derogations on a firm wide basis cannot be more than total number of identified staff, total (row 0120, v12529_m)Warning
- Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation, derogations for identified staff cannot be more than total number of identified staff, total (row 0180, v12530_m)Warning
- Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation, derogations on a firm wide basis cannot be more than total number of identified staff, total (row 0180, v12531_m)Warning
- If number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation is reported, percentage of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation must be reported (row 0040, v12647_m)Warning
Every REM benchmarking rule, by template
Checks like this one, run at the point of submission, are the first step to real-time supervision.